As a small to midsize business grows, demands on its time, talent and resources inevitably expand right along with it. Many business owners reach a point where continuing to do everything in-house — or even themselves — begins to slow progress or expose the company to unnecessary risk. Have you reached this point yet? If so, or even if you’re getting close, outsourcing could be a smart move.

Common candidates

Many business activities can be outsourced. The key is identifying functions that, if handled by an external provider, would improve efficiency, strengthen compliance, and give you and your team more time to focus on revenue-generating work. Here are some common candidates:

Accounting and financial reporting. A reputable provider can manage your books, collect payments, pay invoices and keep accounting technology up to date. It should also be able to prepare financial statements that meet the standards expected by lenders, investors and other outside parties.

Customer service. This may seem an unlikely candidate because you might believe that someone must work for your business to truly represent it. But that’s not necessarily true. Internal customer service departments often have high turnover rates, which drives up costs and reduces service quality. Outsourcing to a provider with a more stable, well-trained team can improve both customer satisfaction and operational consistency.

Information technology (IT). Bringing in an outside firm or consultant to manage your IT needs can provide significant benefits. For starters, you’ll be able to better focus on your mission without the constant distraction of changing technology. Also, a provider will stay current on the best hardware and software for your business, as well as help you securely access, store and protect your data.

Payroll and human resources (HR). These functions are governed by complex regulations that change frequently — as does the necessary software. A qualified vendor can help your business comply with current legal requirements while giving you and your employees a better, more secure platform for accessing payroll and HR information.

Downsides to watch out for

Naturally, outsourcing comes with potential downsides. You’ll need to spend time and resources researching and vetting providers. Then each engagement will involve substantial ongoing expenses.

You’ll also have to place considerable trust in providers — especially in today’s environment, where data breaches are common and cybersecurity is critical. Finally, even a solid outsourcing arrangement requires ongoing communication and management to maintain a productive relationship.

Not a one-size-fits-all solution

Every business owner must carefully consider when to outsource, which services are worth the money and how to measure return on investment over time. If you’d like help evaluating your options or better understanding the financial and tax implications of outsourcing, contact us.

© 2025

S corporation structure provides most of the tax benefits of a partnership plus the liability protection of a corporation. But because of the strict requirements that apply to these entities, preserving S corporation status requires due diligence.

Reap the benefits

Like a traditional C corporation, an S corporation shields its shareholders from personal liability for the corporation’s debts. Like a partnership, an S corporation is a “pass-through” entity, which means that all of its profits and losses are passed through to the owners, who report their allocable shares on their personal income tax returns. This allows S corporations to avoid the double taxation of C corporations, whose income is taxed at the corporate level and again when distributed to shareholders.

To qualify as an S corporation, all of a corporation’s shareholders must file an election with the IRS on Form 2553, Election by a Small Business Corporation. In addition, the corporation must:

• Be a domestic (U.S.) corporation,
• Have no more than 100 shareholders (certain family members are treated as a single shareholder for this purpose),
• Have only “allowable” shareholders (see below),
• Have only one class of stock (generally, that means that all stock confers identical rights to distributions and liquidation proceeds; differences in voting rights are permissible), 
• Not be an “ineligible” corporation, such as an insurance company, a domestic international sales corporation (DISC) or a certain type of financial institution.
• Allowable shareholders include individuals, estates and certain trusts, such as a qualified Subchapter S trust (QSST) and an electing small business trust (ESBT). Partnerships, corporations and nonresident aliens are ineligible.

Preserve and protect

To avoid inadvertent termination of S corporation status, among other things, you should:

• Continually monitor the number and type of shareholders, scrutinize the terms of any trusts that hold shares, and ensure that QSSTs or ESBTs have filed timely elections,
• Include provisions in buy-sell agreements that prevent transfers to ineligible shareholders.
• 
  
• Make sure that if shares are transferred to an ESBT, all potential current beneficiaries are eligible shareholders, and be aware that if shares are held by grantor or testamentary trusts, these types of trusts are eligible shareholders for only two years after the grantor dies or the trust receives the stock. So track the two-year eligibility period and make sure trusts convert into QSSTs or ESBTs or transfer their shares to an eligible shareholder before the period expires. 
• 
  

Also, avoid actions that may be deemed to create a second class of stock, such as making disproportionate distributions.

Stay focused

Avoiding inadvertent termination of your company’s S corporation status is critical. Termination generally will result in the loss of substantial tax benefits. You may be able to get the IRS to retroactively restore your S status, but it can be an expensive, time-consuming process. So stay focused on maintaining compliance with all S corporation requirements. Contact us if you have questions.

© 2025

As a business owner, you know that running payroll involves much more than just compensating employees. Every paycheck represents a complex web of tax obligations that your company must handle accurately and consistently.

Indeed, staying compliant with payroll tax rules is essential to maintaining your business’s reputation and avoiding costly penalties. That’s why it’s essential to regularly review your key payroll tax responsibilities to ensure nothing falls through the cracks.

Federal, state and local

Let’s start with the big ones. As you’re well aware, employers must withhold federal income tax from employees’ paychecks. The amount withheld from each person’s pay depends on two factors: 1) the wage amount, and 2) information provided on the employee’s Form W-4, “Employee’s Withholding Certificate.” Additional withholding rules may apply to commissions and other forms of compensation.

Be sure to stay apprised of your non-federal payroll tax obligations. State income tax withholding rules, for example, apply to many employers. However, nine states have no income tax: Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming.

Certain localities also impose income taxes. And in some places, withholding is required to cover short-term disability, paid family leave or unemployment benefits.

FICA and FUTA

Many an accounting or HR staffer has had to repeatedly explain what these two abbreviations mean. The first one stands for the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). Under this law, payroll taxes consist of two individual taxes.

First is Social Security tax, which is 6.2% of wages up to an annually inflation-adjusted wage base limit. For 2025, that limit is $176,100 (up from $168,600 in 2024). Both the employee and employer pay 6.2% up to that amount, meaning the business withholds the employee’s share and contributes a matching amount for a total of 12.4%The second is Medicare tax, which is 1.45% of all wages, with no wage base cap. Again, both the employee and employer pay the percentage for a total of 2.9%.

The other abbreviation stands for the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA). Under it, employers must pay 6% on the first $7,000 of each employee’s annual wages, before any credit. In many cases, if state unemployment taxes are paid fully and on time, the business can receive a credit of up to 5.4%, yielding an effective rate of 0.6%.

Be aware that certain states with outstanding federal unemployment-trust-fund loans may not qualify for the full credit, so employers could face higher effective FUTA rates in those jurisdictions. FUTA taxes are paid only by the employer, so you shouldn’t withhold them from employees’ wages.

Additional Medicare tax

This payroll tax often flies under the radar. Under a provision of the Affordable Care Act, an additional Medicare tax of 0.9% applies to employee wages above:

• $200,000 for single filers,
• $250,000 for married couples filing jointly, and
• $125,000 for married couples filing separately.

Only employees pay this tax. However, employers are responsible for withholding it once an employee’s wages exceed $200,000 — even if the employee ultimately may not owe it (for example, for joint filers).

State unemployment insurance

Every state also runs its own unemployment insurance program to provide benefits to eligible workers who are involuntarily terminated. State unemployment obligations vary widely in terms of wage base, rate and employer vs. employee contributions.

Generally, the rate employers must pay is based on their experience rating. The more claims made by former employees, the higher the tax rate. States update these rates annually.

Get stronger

Managing payroll taxes can be complex — especially as rates and rules may change from year to year. But you can confidently meet your compliance requirements with the right system, procedures, employees and professional guidance in place. We’d be happy to review your current approach, flag potential risks and recommend ways to strengthen your payroll tax processes. Contact us for more information.

© 2025

If an individual taxpayer has substantial business losses, unfavorable federal income tax rules can potentially come into play. Here’s what you need to know as you assess your 2024 tax situation.

Disallowance rule

The tax rules can get complicated if your business or rental activity throws off a tax loss — and many do during the early years. First, the passive activity loss (PAL) rules may apply if you aren’t very involved in the business or if it’s a rental activity. The PAL rules generally only allow you to deduct passive losses to the extent you have passive income from other sources. However, you can deduct passive losses that have been disallowed in previous years (called suspended PALs) when you sell the activity or property that produced the suspended losses.

If you successfully clear the hurdles imposed by the PAL rules, you face another hurdle: You can’t deduct an excess business loss in the current year. For 2024, an excess business loss is the excess of your aggregate business losses over $305,000 ($610,000 for married joint filers). For 2025, the thresholds are $313,000 and $626,000, respectively. An excess business loss is carried over to the following tax year and can be deducted under the rules for net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards explained below.

Deducting NOLs

You generally can’t use an NOL carryover, including one from an excess business loss, to shelter more than 80% of your taxable income in the carryover year. Also, NOLs generally can’t be carried back to an earlier tax year. They can only be carried forward and can be carried forward indefinitely. The requirement that an excess business loss must be carried forward as an NOL forces you to wait at least one year to get any tax-saving benefit from it.

Example 1: Taxpayer has a partial deductible business loss

David is unmarried. In 2024, he has an allowable loss of $400,000 from his start-up AI venture that he operates as a sole proprietorship.

Although David has no other income or losses from business activities, he has $500,000 of income from other sources (salary, interest, dividends, capital gains and so forth).

David has an excess business loss for the year of $95,000 (the excess of his $400,000 AI venture loss over the $305,000 excess business loss disallowance threshold for 2024 for an unmarried taxpayer). David can deduct the first $305,000 of his loss against his income from other sources. The $95,000 excess business loss is carried forward to his 2025 tax year and treated as part of an NOL carryover to that year.

Variation: If David’s 2024 business loss is $305,000 or less, he can deduct the entire loss against his income from other sources because he doesn’t have an excess business loss.

Example 2: Taxpayers aren’t affected by the disallowance rule Nora and Ned are married and file tax returns jointly. In 2024, Nora has an allowable loss of $350,000 from rental real estate properties (after considering the PAL rules). Ned runs a small business that’s still in the early phase of operations. He runs the business as a single-member LLC that’s treated as a sole proprietorship for tax purposes. For 2024, the business incurs a $150,000 tax loss.

Nora and Ned have no income or losses from other business or rental activities, but they have $600,000 of income from other sources. They don’t have an excess business loss because their combined losses are $500,000. That amount is below the $610,000 excess business loss disallowance threshold for 2024 for married joint filers. So, they’re unaffected by the disallowance rule. They can use their $500,000 business loss to shelter income from other sources.

Partnerships, LLCs and S corporations

The excess business loss disallowance rule is applied at the owner level for business losses from partnerships, S corporations and LLCs treated as partnerships for tax purposes. Each owner’s allocable share of business income, gain, deduction, or loss from these pass-through entities is taken into account on the owner’s Form 1040 for the tax year that includes the end of the entity’s tax year.

The best way forward

As you can see, business losses can be complex. Contact us if you have questions or want more information about the best strategies for your situation.

© 2025

Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the way businesses operate. Its capacity to gather and process data, as well as to mimic human interactions, offers remarkable potential to streamline operations and boost productivity.

But AI presents considerable challenges and concerns, too. With so many tools available, employees may inadvertently or purposely misuse the technology in ways that are unethical or even illegal. Compounding the problem is that many companies lack a formal AI governance policy.

Few in place

In August 2025, software platform provider Genesys released the results of an independent survey of 4,000 consumers and 1,600 enterprise customer experience and information technology (IT) leaders in more than 10 countries. It found that over a third (35%) of tech-leader respondents said their organizations have “little to no formal [AI] governance policies in place.”

This is a pointed problem, the survey notes, because many businesses are gearing up to deploy agentic AI. This is the latest iteration of the technology that can make decisions autonomously and act independently to achieve specific goals without depending on user commands or predefined inputs. The survey found that while 81% of tech leaders trust agentic AI with sensitive customer data, only 36% of consumers do.

7 steps to consider

Whether or not you’re eyeing agentic AI, its growing popularity is creating a trust-building imperative for today’s businesses. That’s why you should consider writing and implementing an AI governance policy.

Formally defined, an AI governance policy is a written framework that establishes how a company may use AI responsibly, transparently, ethically and legally. It outlines the decision-making processes, accountability measures, ethical standards and legal requirements that must guide the development, purchase and deployment of AI tools.

Creating an AI governance policy should be a collaborative effort involving your company’s leadership team, knowledgeable employees (such as IT staff) and professional advisors (such as a technology consultant and attorney). Here are seven steps your team should consider:

1. Audit usage. Identify where and how your business is using AI. For instance, do you use automated tools in marketing or when screening job applicants, auto-generated financial reports, or customer service chatbots? Inventory everything and note who’s using it, what data it relies on and which decisions it influences.

2. Assign ownership for AI oversight. This may mean appointing a small internal team or naming (or hiring) an AI compliance manager or executive. Your oversight team or compliance leader will be responsible for maintaining the policy, reviewing new tools and handling concerns that arise.

3. Establish core principles. Ground your policy in ethical and legal principles — such as fairness, transparency, accountability, privacy and safety. The policy should reflect your company’s mission, vision and values.

4. Set standards for data and vendor use. Include guidelines on how data used by AI tools is collected, stored and shared. Pay particular attention to intellectual property issues. If you use third-party vendors, define review and approval steps to verify that their systems meet your privacy and compliance standards.

5. Require human oversight. Clearly state that employees must remain in control of AI-assisted work. Human judgment should always be part of the process, including approving AI-generated content and reviewing automated financial reports.

6. Include a mandatory review-and-update clause. Schedule regular reviews — at least annually — to assess whether your policy remains relevant. This is especially important as innovations, such as agentic AI, come online and new regulations emerge.

7. Communicate with and train staff. Incorporate AI governance into onboarding for new employees and follow up with regular training and reminder sessions thereafter. Ask staff members to sign an acknowledgment that they’ve read the policy and perhaps another to confirm they’ve completed the required training. Encourage everyone to ask questions and report potential issues.

Financial impact

Writing an AI governance policy is just one part of preparing your business for the future. Understanding its financial impact is another. Let us help you analyze the costs, tax implications and return on investment of AI tools so you can make informed decisions that balance innovation with sound financial management and robust compliance practices.

© 2025

Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), businesses were able to claim a tax deduction for most business-related interest expense. The TCJA created Section 163(j), which generally limits deductions of business interest, with certain exceptions. If your business has significant interest expense, it’s important to understand the impact of the deduction limit on your tax bill. The good news is there may be ways to soften the tax bite in 2025. The nuts and bolts Unless your company is exempt from Sec. 163(j), your maximum business interest deduction for the tax year equals the sum of: 30% of your company’s adjusted taxable income (ATI), Your company’s business interest income, if any, and Your company’s floor plan financing interest, if any. Assuming your company doesn’t have significant business interest income or floor plan financing interest expense, the deduction limitation is roughly equal to 30% of ATI. Your company’s ATI is its taxable income, excluding: Nonbusiness income, gain, deduction or loss, Business interest income or expense, Net operating loss deductions, and The 20% qualified business income deduction for pass-through entities. When Sec. 163(j) first became law, ATI was computed without regard to depreciation, amortization or depletion. But for tax years beginning after 2021, those items are subtracted in calculating ATI, shrinking business interest deductions for companies with significant depreciable assets. Deductions disallowed under Sec. 163(j) may be carried forward indefinitely and treated as business interest expense paid or accrued in future tax years. In subsequent tax years, the carryforward amount is applied as if it were incurred in that year, and the limitation for that year will determine how much of the disallowed interest can be deducted. There are special rules for applying the deduction limit to pass-through entities, such as partnerships, S corporations and limited liability companies that are treated as partnerships for tax purposes. Small businesses are exempt from the business interest deduction limit. These are businesses whose average annual gross receipts for the preceding three tax years don’t exceed a certain threshold. (There’s an exception if the business is treated as a “tax shelter.”) To prevent larger businesses from splitting themselves into small entities to qualify for the exemption, certain related businesses must aggregate their gross receipts for purposes of the threshold. Ways to avoid the limit Some real estate and farming businesses can opt out of the business interest deduction limit and therefore avoid it or at least reduce its impact. Real estate businesses include those that engage in real property development, redevelopment, construction, reconstruction, acquisition, conversion, rental, operation, management, leasing or brokerage. Remember that opting out of the interest deduction limit comes at a cost. If you do so, you must reduce depreciation deductions for certain business property by using longer recovery periods. To determine whether opting out will benefit your business, you’ll need to weigh the tax benefit of unlimited interest deductions against the tax cost of lower depreciation deductions. Another tax-reduction strategy is capitalizing interest expense. Capitalized interest isn’t treated as interest for purposes of the Sec. 163(j) deduction limit. The tax code allows businesses to capitalize certain overhead costs, including interest, related to the acquisition or production of property. Interest capitalized to equipment or other fixed assets can be recovered over time through depreciation, while interest capitalized to inventory can be deducted as part of the cost of goods sold. We can crunch the numbers to determine which strategy would provide a better tax advantage for your business. You also may be able to mitigate the impact of the deduction limit by reducing your interest expense. For example, you might rely more on equity than debt to finance your business or pay down debts when possible. Or you could generate interest income (for example, by extending credit to customers) to offset some interest expense. Weigh your options Unfortunately, the business interest deduction limitation isn’t one of the many provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act scheduled to expire at the end of 2025. But it’s possible Congress could act to repeal the limitation or alleviate its impact. If your company is affected by the business interest deduction limitation, contact us to discuss the impact on your tax bill. We can help assess what’s right for your situation. © 2025

If you’re claiming deductions for business meals or vehicle expenses, expect the IRS to closely review them. In some cases, taxpayers have incomplete documentation or try to create records months (or years) later. In doing so, they fail to meet the strict substantiation requirements set forth under tax law. Tax auditors are adept at rooting out inconsistencies, omissions and errors in taxpayers’ records, as illustrated by one recent U.S. Tax Court case. (T.C. Memo. 2024-82) Facts of the case The taxpayer operated a software installation, training and consulting business. She claimed substantial deductions for several tax years. The IRS disallowed many of the deductions and the U.S. Tax Court agreed. Here’s a rundown of some of the disallowed expenses and the reasons why they couldn’t be deducted: Meals and entertainment. The business owner deducted nearly $9,000 for meal expenses in one tax year and testified the amount was for “working lunches” with the “person she worked for and the developer.” As documentation, she submitted bank statements. The court noted that “bank statements alone do not substantiate the ‘business purpose of the expense’ or the ‘business relationship’ between petitioner and the individuals with whom she dined.” It added: “The cost of eating lunch during the workday is not — without more — a deductible business expense.” Supplies. The taxpayer deducted more than $17,000 for supplies purchased during two tax years. She testified that these included “desks, monitors, office equipment, paper, printers, [and] anything that was pertinent to the business itself.” To substantiate her reported expenses, the taxpayer submitted receipts from office supply stores. However, the receipts were dated later than the tax years in question, and they covered (among other things) purchases of soda dispensers and gift cards. The court noted that “some of these purchases appear personal” and all were made after she terminated her consulting business. Home office expenses. Over two years, the taxpayer deducted $21,393 for the business use of a home office. But the court ruled that she “failed to prove that the ‘focal point’ of her software consulting business was her home.” At trial, she testified that she was required to be on site at a client’s office much of the time. In addition, she didn’t supply evidence to establish how much time she worked from home or what (if any) portion of her residence was used exclusively for business purposes. Other expenses the court disallowed included attorney’s fees, utilities, hotel stays and vehicle expenses. In all cases, the taxpayer didn’t substantiate with adequate records or sufficient evidence that the expenses were related to her business. Best practices This case exemplifies why it’s critical to maintain meticulous records to support business expense deductions. Here’s a list of DOs and DON’Ts to help meet the strict IRS and tax law substantiation requirements for these items: DO keep detailed, accurate records. For example, for each business meal, record the amount, date, place, business purpose, and the business relationship of any person you dine with. If you have employees whom you reimburse for meals, travel and vehicle expenses, make sure they’re complying with all the rules. DON’T reconstruct expense logs at year end or wait until you receive a notice from the IRS. Take a moment to record the details in a log or diary or on a receipt at the time of an event or soon after. Require employees to submit weekly or monthly expense reports. DO respect the fine line between personal and business expenses. Be careful about combining business and pleasure. Your business checking account and credit cards shouldn’t be used for personal expenses. DON’T be surprised if the IRS asks you to prove your deductions. Vehicle, travel, meal and home office expenses are attention magnets. Be prepared for a challenge. Stand up to scrutiny With organization and our guidance, your tax records can stand up to IRS inspection. There may be other ways to substantiate your deductions. In addition, there may be a way to estimate certain deductions (called “the Cohan rule”), if your records are lost due to a fire, theft, flood or other disaster. © 2025

5 tax breaks on the table: What business owners should know about the latest proposals

A bill in Congress — dubbed The One, Big, Beautiful Bill — could significantly reshape several federal business tax breaks. While the proposed legislation is still under debate, it’s already sparking attention across business communities. Here’s a look at the current rules and proposed changes for five key tax provisions and what they could mean for your business. 1. Bonus depreciation Current rules: Businesses can deduct 40% of the cost of eligible new and used equipment in the year it’s placed in service. (In 2026, this will drop to 20%, eventually phasing out entirely by 2027.) Proposed change: The bill would restore 100% bonus depreciation retroactively for property acquired after January 19, 2025, and extend it through 2029. This would be a major win for businesses looking to invest in equipment, machinery and certain software. Why it matters: A full deduction in the year of purchase would allow for faster depreciation, freeing up cash flow. This could be especially beneficial for capital-intensive industries. 2. Section 179 expensing Current rules: Businesses can “expense” up to $1.25 million of qualified asset purchases in 2025, with a phaseout beginning at $3.13 million. Under Section 179, businesses can deduct the cost of qualifying equipment or software in the year it’s placed in service, rather than depreciating it over several years. Proposed change: The bill would increase the expensing limit to $2.5 million and the phaseout threshold to $4 million for property placed into service after 2024. The amounts would be adjusted annually for inflation. Why it matters: This provision could help smaller businesses deduct more of the cost (or the entire cost) of qualifying purchases without dealing with depreciation schedules. Larger thresholds would mean more flexibility for expanding operations. 3. Qualified business income (QBI) deduction Current rules: Created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the QBI deduction is currently available through 2025 to owners of pass-through entities. These include S corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, sole proprietors and most self-employed individuals. QBI is defined as the net amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction and loss that are effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. business. The deduction generally equals 20% of QBI, not to exceed 20% of taxable income minus net capital gain. But it’s subject to additional limits that can reduce or eliminate the tax benefit. Proposed change: Under the bill, the QBI tax break would be made permanent. Additionally, the deduction amount would increase to 23% for tax years beginning after 2025. Why it matters: The increased deduction rate and permanent extension would lead to substantial tax savings for eligible pass-through entities. If the deduction is made permanent and adjusted for inflation, businesses could engage in more effective long-term tax planning. 4. Research and experimental (R&E) expensing Current rules: Under the TCJA, businesses must capitalize and amortize domestic R&E costs over five years (15 years for foreign research). Proposed change: The bill would reinstate a deduction available to businesses that conduct R&E. Specifically, the deduction would apply to R&E costs incurred after 2024 and before 2030. Providing added flexibility, the bill would allow taxpayers to elect whether to deduct or amortize the expenditures. (The requirement under current law to amortize such expenses would be suspended while the deduction is available.) Why it matters: Many businesses — especially startups and tech firms — depend heavily on research investments. Restoring current expensing could ease tax burdens and encourage innovation. 5. Increase in information reporting amounts Current rules: The annual reporting threshold for payments made by a business for services performed by an independent contractor is generally $600. That means businesses must send a Form 1099-NEC to contractors they pay more than $600 by January 31 of the following year. Proposed change: The bill would generally increase the threshold to $2,000 in payments during the year and adjust it for inflation. This provision would apply to payments made after December 31, 2024. (The bill would also make changes to the rules for Form 1099-K issued by third-party settlement organizations.) Why it matters: This proposal would reduce the administrative burdens on businesses. Fewer 1099-NECs would need to be prepared and filed, especially for small engagements. If the provision is enacted, contractors would receive fewer 1099-NECs. Income below $2,000 annually would still have to be reported to the IRS, so contractors may have to be more diligent in tracking income. More to consider These are just five of the significant changes being proposed. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill also proposes changes to the business interest expense deduction and some employee benefits. It would eliminate federal income tax on eligible tips and overtime — and make many more changes. If enacted, the bill could deliver immediate and long-term tax relief to certain business owners. It narrowly passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and is currently being considered in the Senate. Changes are likely to be made there, at which point the new version would have to be passed again by the House before being sent to President Trump to be signed into law. The current uncertainty means business owners shouldn’t act prematurely. While these changes may sound beneficial, their complexity — and the possibility of retroactive provisions — make professional guidance essential. Contact us to discuss how to proceed in your situation. © 2025

Businesses can still choose to address sustainability

For many years, businesses of all shapes and sizes have at least considered sustainability when running their operations. Many people — including customers, investors, employees and job candidates — care about how a company impacts the environment. And reducing energy use, water consumption and waste generally lowers operational costs. However, the current “environment regarding the environment,” has changed. With the passage of the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), the federal government has disincentivized businesses from taking certain green measures. So, you may be reevaluating your company’s stance on sustainability. Apparent interest According to one survey, a serious interest in sustainability remains present among many businesses. In February, management consultancy Kearney, in association with climate action media platform We Don’t Have Time, released the results of a survey of more than 500 finance executives from companies in the United States, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates and India. Of those respondents, 93% said they saw a clear business case for sustainability. Meanwhile, 92% expected to invest more in sustainability this year — with 62% of respondents saying they planned to allocate more than 2.1% of revenue to sustainability in 2025. Now whether and how fully these investments come to fruition this year is hard to say. However, the fact remains that sustainability has been and will likely continue to be a strategically significant factor in many industries. Vanishing tax breaks As mentioned, the OBBBA has thrown a wrench into tax relief related to certain sustainable measures. For example, the Section 179D Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings Deduction has been around since 2006. It got a big boost from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022, which increased the potential size of the deduction and expanded the pool of eligible taxpayers. However, the OBBBA permanently eliminates this tax break for buildings or systems on which construction begins after June 30, 2026. The OBBBA also nixes an incentive for the business use of “clean” vehicles. The Qualified Commercial Clean Vehicle Credit, under Sec. 45W of the tax code, hadn’t been previously scheduled to expire until after 2032. However, it’s now available only for vehicles acquired on or before September 30, 2025. Depending on vehicle weight, the maximum credit is up to $7,500 or $40,000. Has your company installed an electric vehicle charger or another qualified dispenser of or storage facility for clean-burning fuel? If so, you may be able to claim the Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property Credit under Sec. 30C of the tax code. The IRA had scheduled the credit — which is worth up to $100,000 per item — to sunset after 2032. But under the OBBBA, eligible property must be placed in service on or before June 30, 2026, to qualify. Tailored strategy Where does all this leave your business? Well, naturally, it’s up to you and your leadership team whether you want to address sustainability and, if you decide to do so, precisely how. Typically, when devising or revising a strategy in this area, your company should: Conduct an up-to-date baseline assessment of energy use, water consumption, waste generation and your business’s overall carbon footprint, Set clear goals and metrics based on reliable data and the input of professional advisors, Address the impact of logistics, your supply chain and employee transportation, and Communicate effectively with staff to gather feedback and build buy-in. And don’t necessarily give up on tax incentives. Although some federal tax breaks may be going away in the near future, state and local ones might exist that could benefit your business. Your call Again, as a business owner, you get to make the call regarding your company’s philosophy and approach to sustainability. If it’s something you intend to prioritize, we can help you review your operations and identify cost-effective and possibly tax-saving ways to make a positive environmental impact. © 2025

A bill in Congress — dubbed The One, Big, Beautiful Bill — could significantly reshape several federal business tax breaks. While the proposed legislation is still under debate, it’s already sparking attention across business communities.

Here’s a look at the current rules and proposed changes for five key tax provisions and what they could mean for your business.

1. Bonus depreciation

Current rules: Businesses can deduct 40% of the cost of eligible new and used equipment in the year it’s placed in service. (In 2026, this will drop to 20%, eventually phasing out entirely by 2027.)

Proposed change: The bill would restore 100% bonus depreciation retroactively for property acquired after January 19, 2025, and extend it through 2029. This would be a major win for businesses looking to invest in equipment, machinery and certain software.

Why it matters: A full deduction in the year of purchase would allow for faster depreciation, freeing up cash flow. This could be especially beneficial for capital-intensive industries.

2. Section 179 expensing

Current rules: Businesses can “expense” up to $1.25 million of qualified asset purchases in 2025, with a phaseout beginning at $3.13 million. Under Section 179, businesses can deduct the cost of qualifying equipment or software in the year it’s placed in service, rather than depreciating it over several years.

Proposed change: The bill would increase the expensing limit to $2.5 million and the phaseout threshold to $4 million for property placed into service after 2024. The amounts would be adjusted annually for inflation.

Why it matters: This provision could help smaller businesses deduct more of the cost (or the entire cost) of qualifying purchases without dealing with depreciation schedules. Larger thresholds would mean more flexibility for expanding operations.

3. Qualified business income (QBI) deduction

Current rules: Created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the QBI deduction is currently available through 2025 to owners of pass-through entities. These include S corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, sole proprietors and most self-employed individuals. QBI is defined as the net amount of qualified items of income, gain, deduction and loss that are effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. business. The deduction generally equals 20% of QBI, not to exceed 20% of taxable income minus net capital gain. But it’s subject to additional limits that can reduce or eliminate the tax benefit.

Proposed change: Under the bill, the QBI tax break would be made permanent. Additionally, the deduction amount would increase to 23% for tax years beginning after 2025.

Why it matters: The increased deduction rate and permanent extension would lead to substantial tax savings for eligible pass-through entities. If the deduction is made permanent and adjusted for inflation, businesses could engage in more effective long-term tax planning.

4. Research and experimental (R&E) expensing

Current rules: Under the TCJA, businesses must capitalize and amortize domestic R&E costs over five years (15 years for foreign research).

Proposed change: The bill would reinstate a deduction available to businesses that conduct R&E. Specifically, the deduction would apply to R&E costs incurred after 2024 and before 2030. Providing added flexibility, the bill would allow taxpayers to elect whether to deduct or amortize the expenditures. (The requirement under current law to amortize such expenses would be suspended while the deduction is available.)

Why it matters: Many businesses — especially startups and tech firms — depend heavily on research investments. Restoring current expensing could ease tax burdens and encourage innovation.

5. Increase in information reporting amounts

Current rules: The annual reporting threshold for payments made by a business for services performed by an independent contractor is generally $600. That means businesses must send a Form 1099-NEC to contractors they pay more than $600 by January 31 of the following year.

Proposed change: The bill would generally increase the threshold to $2,000 in payments during the year and adjust it for inflation. This provision would apply to payments made after December 31, 2024. (The bill would also make changes to the rules for Form 1099-K issued by third-party settlement organizations.)

Why it matters: This proposal would reduce the administrative burdens on businesses. Fewer 1099-NECs would need to be prepared and filed, especially for small engagements. If the provision is enacted, contractors would receive fewer 1099-NECs. Income below $2,000 annually would still have to be reported to the IRS, so contractors may have to be more diligent in tracking income.

More to consider

These are just five of the significant changes being proposed. The One, Big, Beautiful Bill also proposes changes to the business interest expense deduction and some employee benefits. It would eliminate federal income tax on eligible tips and overtime — and make many more changes.

If enacted, the bill could deliver immediate and long-term tax relief to certain business owners. It narrowly passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and is currently being considered in the Senate. Changes are likely to be made there, at which point the new version would have to be passed again by the House before being sent to President Trump to be signed into law. The current uncertainty means business owners shouldn’t act prematurely.

While these changes may sound beneficial, their complexity — and the possibility of retroactive provisions — make professional guidance essential. Contact us to discuss how to proceed in your situation.

© 2025